Pursue a Real Solution

Comments

3 responses to “Pursue a Real Solution”

1. 

   Reach Upward

   2008-11-04

   Some would argue that the phrase “each state shall have at least one Representative” should be rendered as “each state, district, or territory shall have at least one Representative.” However, I would not agree with this, as some territories have very low populations. Moreover, most non-states do not share the obligations that states shoulder. If they want to legislate like states, they should shoulder those obligations.

   There are plenty that would circumvent the Constitution to give DC congressional representation. I completely disagree with this direction. If the Constitution unjustly excludes DC from appropriate representation, we should amend the document and make it right.

   Each time this has been tried, however, supporters have discovered very little support among the state legislatures that must vote on the measure. Moreover, they found very little support — even in a heavily Democratic congress — for passage of such an amendment.

   Since they can’t get it done the right way, they are looking for other avenues, assuming that the injustice of no representation justifies this approach. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

   Reply
2. 

   David

   2008-11-04

   I think that they could find the necessary support if they were to make the amendment not DC-specific (in other words it should be generic to all non-state areas of the nation). I also think that the only guarantee of voting representation should be statehood (in other words territories that don’t meet the population requirements established by Congress would not get voting representation).

   Even if they cannot get the necessary level of support they should not try to circumvent the Constitution.

   Reply
3. 

   citizenw

   2009-11-25

   DC is, to my knowledge, the only non-state jurisdiction which pays Federal taxes. It is also the only one of the non-state territories which was part of the original posterity to which the founders referred when they pledged their Lives, their Fortunes, and their Sacred Honor to secure Liberty.

   That said, the fundamental first principle of participative forms of government is that “just” (ie, legitimate) power flows from the Consent of the Governed. The DC grievance is not (only) about taxes, not even mostly about taxes. It is about Consent of the Governed (or rather the lack of it).

   With that in mind, I believe that there is some sense in suggestions that all districts and territories deserve representation (ie, the opportunity to consent to how they are governed). If they are not large enough in population to warrant individual representation, then they could be “gerrymandered” into “districts” large enough to warrant collective representation (they should in that case also be included in the same requirements other citizens have, such as paying taxes).

   Another alternative is to allow DC residents to “affiliate” with states, much as expatriate Americans living abroad can still vote in the state of origin years and decades after they have moved abroad (sometimes never to return).

   There are myriad ways to resolve the issue of lack of DC representation. The key point is that DC denizens, having been excluded from the system for over two centuries, cannot implement the necessary changes from outside. The impetus must come from their fellow countrymen in the fifty states.

   Reply