• Search

  • February 2012
    S M T W T F S
    « Jan    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    26272829  
  • Etcetera

    • RSS for PostPosts
    • RSS for CommentsComments
    • David Miller ©2012
    • Creative Commons License
    • Citation:
    • David Miller - {date} - {url}
    • Powered by WordPress
    • Hosted by Hostmonster

Supporting Amendment B

2008 Ballot Initiatives ==> Rejecting Amendment A => Supporting Amendment B => Rejecting Amendment C => Supporting Amendment D => Rejecting Amendment E

I was pleased to find that Constitutional Amendment B was absolutely as straightforward in its proposed wording as the description suggested. It simply inserts one line into the Constitution allowing for more flexibility in adding funds to the existing state trust fund without making it easier for the Legislature to remove money from the fund. Believing that the fund is a positive tool funding our government services I am happy to support a no-nonsense change that can make it easier to augment the trust fund when resources are avaiable to do so.

At first I worried that making it easier to add to the trust fund would encourage the Legislature to keep surpluses of revenue, but then I realized that 1) they already do keep portions of any surplus fund one-time contributions to pet projects, and 2) they still have the same incentive to give tax-refunds when possible to fuel their re-election popularity. The difference now is that they have the option when there are surplusses to put some of the surplus in the trust fund so that it can increase funding for services in perpetuity rather than being limited to large, one-time gifts to specific projects.

Leave a Reply

All fields are optional. (Anonymous comments are moderated.)

Pursuit of Liberty © 2004 - 2012
Clean Theme by David Miller
Proudly powered by WordPress - Valid: XHTML, CSS, RSS