• Search

  • February 2012
    S M T W T F S
    « Jan    
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    26272829  
  • Etcetera

    • RSS for PostPosts
    • RSS for CommentsComments
    • David Miller ©2012
    • Creative Commons License
    • Citation:
    • David Miller - {date} - {url}
    • Powered by WordPress
    • Hosted by Hostmonster

Supporting Amendment D

2008 Ballot Initiatives ==> Rejecting Amendment A => Supporting Amendment B => Rejecting Amendment C => Supporting Amendment D => Rejecting Amendment E

With the insertion of only 12 words Constitutional Amendment D would close a technicality which could be used by some enterprising politicians to wreak havoc on the necessary and often too-political process of redistricting. Now is a good time to do it too because, while redistricting is usually little more than adjusting existing district boundaries, our next redistricting will include the creation of a new district (barring some major surprises). Without this amendment, redistricting could be declared invalid if a special session became necessary on a different subject between the time of the census and the next general session. Also, it could be challenged in the event of the U.S. Census Bureau taking longer than expected to process the census results.

This amendment helps to protect the state from adding any more political maneuvering in this important and often partisan process.

Leave a Reply

All fields are optional. (Anonymous comments are moderated.)

Pursuit of Liberty © 2004 - 2012
Clean Theme by David Miller
Proudly powered by WordPress - Valid: XHTML, CSS, RSS